Sunday, April 19, 2020

Last Map Is the Heart the Broken Globe Essay Example

Last Map Is the Heart: the Broken Globe Paper Leaving home does not mean abandoning ones traditions and beliefs. One will find new truths with their new surroundings; one may reject these truths if they so desire. Canadian author Henry Kreisel uses irony throughout his short story The Broken Globe. It is an ironic drama that demonstrates the relationship between a father and son. Nick Solchuck, geophysicist, is the son of a man who believes the Earth to be flat and still. Many immigrants who leave their native land hold strongly to traditions and beliefs; this is particularly hard for Mr. Solchuck considering new world realizations and the ironic success of his son, Nick. Mr. Solchuck grew up in a small Ukrainian village where he was educated by a medieval priest. He believed that everyone spoke against what he had learned in that school was turning to Satan. He grew up in a place where â€Å"the sun rose in the East and set in the West,† †¦ (Kreisel 143), this demonstrates how medieval Mr. Solcucks education was, he literally grew up in a time and place that people believed the sun was mobile. This held him back his entire life as he could not even accept the possibility of new concepts. With prolonged hatred towards the French, Mr. Solchuck is deeply offended when his son, Nick is practicing French under his roof. We will write a custom essay sample on Last Map Is the Heart: the Broken Globe specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Last Map Is the Heart: the Broken Globe specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Last Map Is the Heart: the Broken Globe specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Kreisel includes this part of the story because it links to a bigger issue of Mr. Solchucks poor education and ignorance. Nick Solchuck realizes about his father: â€Å"He wasnt mad but that he lived in the universe of the medieval church,† (Kreisel 143). This was Nick coming to the clearing of an internal storm representing the relationship between him and his father. Mr. Solchuck was holding strongly to what he knew to be true. â€Å"That thing over there,† (Kreisel 148), Mr. Solchuck refers to his son Nicks globe, â€Å"its a false thing,† (Kreisel 148) he states confidently. Nick had brought the globe home when he was 13 years old. Mr. Solchucks inability to accept the globes shape and his sons acceptance of it results in a broken globe. The broken globe is a symbol of Mr. Solchucks battle with his sons success and beliefs. Mr. Solchuck physically attacks the globe because it goes so beyond his beliefs. This event is so significant in Kreisels short story, that the title is in direct relation with it. It is not easy for Mr. Solchuck to stay true to his beliefs, and traditions from his Ukrainian background while his son Nick takes to the new world realizations, and finds success in becoming a geophysicist. Mr. Solchuck was taught that the Earth was flat, and that anyone who spoke against what hed been taught was turning to Satan. Mr. Solchucks old fashioned grudge-holding, abusive ways to attempt to halt the education of Nick Solchuck; Nick knows his father is not mad, he knows there is something to be respected in what comes off as ignorance. The broken globe that stands between t he father and son is symbolic in represent Mr. Solchucks struggle and inability to accept science.

Thursday, April 2, 2020

Greek vs Roman Philsophy on physical education Research Paper Example

Greek vs Roman Philsophy on physical education Paper Roman and Greek philosophies influenced modern physical education in deference ways. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the different philosophies or beliefs the Greek and Roman cultures had. They each had different beliefs but they also shared some similarities. The Greeks established much of the Westerns world belief about physical education. There were two metaphysical systems In Greece: Naturalistic and Anta- naturalistic. Naturalistic means a mans nature Is both spiritual and physical. Anta- naturalistic means mans nature created by mind. Both views believed In an Importance on mind, the difference In beliefs was the body. W Sparta and Athens were each a part of Greece and they each had different philosophies on physical education. Sparta believed highly In physical education. Therefore they were physically fit and great soldiers. Sparta was the military center and power of Greece. Athens was the center of culture and learning. Athens believe physical education had a prominent place in education. Romans were polytheistic like the Greeks. Most of their gods were the same as Greeks but with Roman names. Romans were great engineers although they did not do as much scientifically as Greeks did. Romans philosophy on physical education was similar to Sparta. They believed in being physically fit and strong soldiers. Philosophers of the Roman Empire provided code of conduct, critical to the development of citizens and the survival of the Republic. The early republic of Rome stayed physically fit but did not believe in the Greek way of competition. We will write a custom essay sample on Greek vs Roman Philsophy on physical education specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Greek vs Roman Philsophy on physical education specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Greek vs Roman Philsophy on physical education specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Over time this began to change and Romans became less interested in being physically fit. They became a Republic of spectators. The games did not translate to physical education as they did in Greece. Greece and Rome both had an impact on physical education. There philosophies were a lot alike at first but, over time Romeos philosophy began to change. In my opinion the Roman change was not good. I think Sparta had the best philosophy compared to Athens and Rome. My philosophy on physical education has been Influenced by both Rome and Greece. Greek vs. Roman Philosophy on physical education By Samaritan Roman and Greek philosophies influenced modern physical education in difference education. There were two metaphysical systems in Greece: Naturalistic and Anti- naturalistic. Naturalistic means a mans nature is both spiritual and physical. Anti- naturalistic means mans nature created by mind. Both views believed in an importance on mind, the difference in beliefs was the body. W philosophies on physical education. Sparta believed highly in physical education. Influenced by both Rome and Greece.